- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:41:42 -0700
- To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, 'Doug Schepers' <schepers@w3.org>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org>, 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>
On 04/16/2015 07:33 AM, David Dailey wrote: > Here is a very simple example [1] with CSS-animated SVG taken from > Wikipedia's article on SVG animation [2] and embedded in HTML <img>. The > image displays at different sized in IE vs. Chrome and FF. It does not > animate in Firefox [...] > My questions here are: > 1. are the cross-browser idiosyncracies with CSS-animated animation in <img> > just browser bugs, and if so, whose bugs are they? The Firefox lack-of-animation here is indeed a bug, probably one of the following: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908634 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1121478 > 2. Is it true that script will always be required for certain animation > effects for those browsers that do not support SVG/SMIL? The question may > have implications toward future college acceptance requirements: SAT Math > scores and the like. To the extent that there exist SVG attributes that aren't animatable with CSS animations: yes, I think you're right about this.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2015 16:42:16 UTC