- From: L2L 2L <emanuelallen@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:18:05 -0400
- To: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- CC: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
SMIL is dead.... I'm truly waiting on web animation api... So I might just go to canvas. E-S4L N-S4L J-S4L > On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:09 AM, "Rick" <graham.rick@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've not used CSS animations with SVG, but as Olaf has mentioned, SVG > has it's own SMIL spec which is implemented. > > Here is a link to the current spec section: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/animate.html > > Tutorials can be found on line, also the SVG test suite can be very > useful in learning about animations. > >> On 9/17/14, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> clearly, the CSS draft about animation is not applicable for SVG 1.x. >> If there is an effect due to a feature of this draft, this is clearly a bug >> in >> the related viewer ;o) >> >> However, SVG mentions CSS properties, which apply to SVG, >> most of them available as attributes as well. >> Typically one can animate those with declarative animation in SVG - >> and for this type of animation one can select between animating >> the attribute or the CSS property. >> Therefore in SVG 1.x one can animate CSS properties using SVG, >> but not the other way around. >> >> In the future (SVG 2 draft), maybe most attributes will have a >> corresponding >> properties as well - and if the SVG 2 draft mentions, that CSS animations >> apply, this might work in the future, at least if viewer do what will be >> recommended ;o) >> Hoewever, due to the typical implemetation strategies, this might implicate >> a lot of more bugs in viewers (suddenly they assume, that SVG 1.x >> attributes >> can be properties as well, just because these exist in the SVG 2 draft) >> >> >> Olaf > > > -- > If we do not change our direction we are likely to end up where we are > headed.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 17:18:37 UTC