- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:50:28 +1200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbAf+0sAo=w0iF-DE7UXovkJaKOStiBPBRWpE0r9-oS4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Note that this works well for <color>/<image> values, as changing them > would not require the document to be reflowed. If we want to support > parameterisation of other property types using a mechanism other than CSS > Variables, I'm not sure whether we could make any improvement. > I think this makes some sense for paint-server values. We already have a level of indirection there with, for example, 'object-fill' and 'object-stroke', and extending that with a richer vocabulary would not be hard. I don't think it makes sense for other values though since you could easily end up adding complexity everywhere in the engine those values are used. I wonder if it would be better to fix this in CSS Variables, so that people can define variable values that can be changed without triggering a full restyle. Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 04:50:56 UTC