Re: minutes, 20 November 2014 SVG WG telcon

Hello Cameron,

Thursday, November 20, 2014, 10:29:19 PM, you wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2014/11/20-svg-minutes.html


> mailinglist policy

>     DS: svg was one of the first WGs to do all work in the public
>     ... we wasnt sure how this was going to work at the time, so we
>     setup a parallell mailinglist (public-svg-wg)
>     ... not clear to me that we should use that one

The main difference is that public-svg-wg is a db-backed list and
everyone on it is a member of the SVG WG therefore under the patent
policy. So posting is restricted to SVG WG; archives are public.

www-svg is public write and public archive.

>     ... it's not really public, just publicly readable
>     ... I propose that we close that mailinglist
>     ... and that we do all our work on www-svg

>     nikos: we already resolved to do that
>     ... we jsut havent executed it

Yes, we did.

>     DS: other groups have tracker go to the public list

>     CM: that could get noisy

>     DS: so we could send those to the public-svg-wg list then?

Sounds good (but is *not* what the resolution says)


>     CM: ok, sounds good

>     RESOLUTION: we will deactivate public-svg-wg, keeping the
>     archives, repository changes will go to the w3c-svg-wg and
>     tracker + technical discussions to www-svg

I'm not happy with that resolution because I want the minimum possible
to go to the member-only w3c-svg-wg.

I see absolutely no reason to make repository change emails go to a
W3C Member-only list archive.

Send them to public-svg-wg instead where anyone can see them. Just
like Doug said.

>     DS: agenda items should also go to www-svg




-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain

Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 13:55:15 UTC