Re: marker-pattern has a weird grammar

• From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:32:30 -0800
• To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAAWBYDB27v2oCB4xkiCDSBj=jmjN=m+njHwAU22=pxSbdVCRhA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's a grammar that expresses what we want better:
>
> <marker-gap>? <marker-ref-group> [ <marker-gap> <marker-ref-group> ]*
> <marker-gap>?
> <marker-gap> = <length> | <percentage>
> <marker-ref-group> = none | <marker-ref>+

Line-wrapping made this harder to read - the first two lines are the
marker-pattern grammar.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 23:33:16 UTC