- From: Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 03:19:45 +1300
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfsppAJCvr8uy0LFeE9w_BMiA7+gK7MXonOZrLZKQKerqn4Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Has there been any prior discussion between this WG and the CSS WG about resolving the discrepancy between the definitions of the SVG and CSS number type? The difference is that SVG number allows exponents and CSS doesn't. This becomes an issue with style properties. As an experiment, I tried the following test file on several renderers. <svg width="400" height="400" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <style> #one { opacity: .5; } #two { opacity: 5E-1; } </style> <rect x="0" id="one" width="100" height="100" fill="red" opacity=".5"/> <rect x="101" id="two" width="100" height="100" fill="red" opacity="5E-1"/> <rect x="0" y="101" id="one" width="100" height="100" fill="red"/> <rect x="101" y="101" id="two" width="100" height="100" fill="red"/> <rect x="0" y="202" width="100" height="100" fill="red" style="opacity: .5" /> <rect x="101" y="202" width="100" height="100" fill="red" style="opacity: 5E-1" /> </svg> (The "0.5" test is in there because I was testing that for another reason.) Anyway, I got varying results. Chrome33 FF28 IE11 Safari5.1 Batik1.7 opacity=".5" YES YES YES YES YES *opacity="5E-1" YES YES YES NO(!) NO* CSS "opacity: .5" YES YES YES YES NO(!) *CSS "opacity: 5E-1" NO NO YES NO ERROR * style "opacity: .5" YES YES YES YES YES *style "opacity: 5E-1" NO NO YES NO ERROR * If in the future more attributes are to become properties, this discrepancy will need to be resolved, won't it? Paul
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2014 14:20:35 UTC