A few comments on http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/improving-svg-dom/

Are <switch>, hasExtension, systemLanguage, requiredFeatures and
requiredExtensions worth keeping? I think this kind of feature selection is
widely considerd an anti-pattern at this point. Have these actually been
used in good ways? If so, I haven't seen it.

Seems to me that getCTM, getScreenCTM and getTransformToElement should all
be replaced by a new GeometryUtils method, say getTransform(optional
TransformOptions options), with TransformOptions { GeometryNode to; }.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w