RE: ACTION-3631 - altGlyph test for non-svg font formats from Smailus, Thomas O on 2014-06-19 (www-svg@w3.org from June 2014)

From: Smailus, Thomas O <Thomas.O.Smailus@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:49:00 +0000
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <175A0EE510663A46ACD5FF1A03AD46F50EF91A@XCH-BLV-204.nw.nos.boeing.com>

Agreed.

Thomas
--
Thomas Smailus, Ph.D.  P.E.
Boeing Information Technology
thomas.o.smailus@boeing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:22
To: Chris Lilley
Cc: Erik Dahlström; www-svg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-3631 - altGlyph test for non-svg font formats

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
> Thursday, June 19, 2014, 6:20:26 PM, you wrote:
>> Given that we have already removed SVG Fonts from SVG2 and given that 
>> altGlyph is effectively useless without SVG Fonts, I'd like to 
>> propose that we also drop altGlyph, altGlyphDef, altGlyphItem and 
>> glyphRef from SVG2. Thoughts?
>
> Yes.

Also yes.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:49:34 UTC