- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 09:26:07 -0800
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-fx <public-fx@w3.org>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Cameron McCormack wrote: >>> I think it's going to be kind of unobvious that you need to use >>> image(color) for the common case of putting a colour underneath a >>> hatch pattern. For example not being able to write: >>> >>> fill: yellow, url(#diagonalhatch); > Dirk Schulze wrote: >> >> This example doesn’t make sense. You the last specified layer is the >> last layer to draw. In your case you would not see diagonal hatch >> because you fill the are with yellow right after it. > > Oh, because in 'background' the list of background layers goes from > front to back, I see. I forgot that. Why is that the case again? :) Because that's the way that makes sense to non-implementors. Nobody cares about the painting order, they care about the visual order, and 'background' puts the first visual layer you see first in the list. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 17:26:56 UTC