Re: tabindex from Cameron McCormack on 2014-08-16 (www-svg@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 15:04:59 +1000
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53EEE67B.8020306@mcc.id.au>

Rik Cabanier wrote:
> That makes sense and I think the spec should call that out.
> Didn't we at some point discuss what should happen with tabindex in
> symbols? It seems 'tree order' is not enough.

I don't recall that discussion (doesn't mean it didn't happen) but I 
would expect that it should do the same thing as tabindex used inside 
shadow trees.

Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 05:05:36 UTC