- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:28:39 -0700
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote: > Stephen Chenney: >> The SVG language already contains sufficient functionality to express >> the star element use cases presented thus far. >> > ... >> >> Philip's argument is that the cost of the >> star element is unnecessary. He says nothing at all about the necessity of >> other features. >> > > This is your/his personal point of view - or this is a (maybe small) fragment > of the world you/he can see from your/his point of view ;o) > Unfortunately nobody has the overview from outside, therefore it is > useful to collect results from different points of views to get a slightly > more complete impression ;o) > > If we reduce this idea of 'everything is already possible' to the essentials, > we can replace SVG completely by PNG and MNG. This is not a useful diversion, because no one is saying anything of the sort. Let's keep the conversation on the subject? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 18:29:34 UTC