- From: honyk <j.tosovsky@email.cz>
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 01:37:18 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
On 2013-11-16 honyk wrote: > On 2013-09-21 honyk wrote: > > in my svg files I use lot of circles and render a text on them. As > > the circle itself cannot be used as the textPath target, the final > > code is quite complicated. > > > > By that new primitive I mean the simple circle. With the center in > > the last coord, with the specified diameter and starting at Ymin. > > The direction (clockwise/ccw) would be defined by diameter sign. > > > > I propose 'D' symbol as 'd'iameter. It would be case insensitive > > (relative/absolute doesn't matter here). > > > > Please compare: > > <circle cx="200" cy="200" r="150"/> > > <path d="M200 50A150 150 0 1 1 200 350A150 150 0 1 1 200 50"/> > > <path d="M200 200D300"/> > > > > donut: > > <path d="M200 50A150 150 0 1 1 200 350A150 150 0 1 1 200 50M200 > > 100A100 100 0 1 0 200 300A100 100 0 1 0 200 100"/> > > <path d="M200 200D300 D-200"/> > > > > The main difference between A and D is the final coord, which in case > > of D stays in the center. > > I've noticed a discussion around a new 'B'earing path primitive so I am > refreshing this topic again. > > I went a bit further and 'implemented' an optional angle parameter. > > M0 0D5 - circle with the center at 0,0 with a diameter of 5 rendered > clock-wise > M0 0D5 90 - circular arc starting at 0,0 with a diameter of 5 rendered > clock-wise, but only first 90 degrees. Rendering is performed in the I. > quadrant. > > Both modes differs in the way of connecting to prev/next path segments. > > The direction is specified by the sign of diameter (D5 vs. D-5). > The quadrant is defined with doubled signs, but it could be simplified > (I): ++ <=> + <=> null > (II): -+ > (III): -- > (IV): +- <=> - > > Several examples: > (1) Donut > http://drifted.in/other/donut.png > M0 0D16D-8 > > (2) Arcs > http://drifted.in/other/arcs.png > > (3) Button - rounded rectangle with a cut out > http://drifted.in/other/button.png > For some cases defining % instead of degrees would be handy. See this pie chart example using the proposed syntax: http://drifted.in/other/pie.png Jan
Received on Saturday, 16 November 2013 00:37:46 UTC