W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Porting fill/stroke (and -opacity variants) to plain CSS

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:46:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDmCQw2v5kq=E8J5=vb4aGvfz_jMkcpfrMEyJakHjba8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> 3) Next steps
> * ‘fill’ and ’stroke’ continue to be maintained by the SVG WG and ‘auto’ is added as value and initial value for ‘fill'. CSS Text decoration adds ‘fill’ and ’stroke’ as styling options for text but must exclude ‘color’ as direct style option for SVG Text and defines what ‘auto’ means for text (probably ’none’).

I'm down with this.

> 4) Further discussions (PLEASE NEW THREAD)
> * What is the “boundary” of floating text for SVG paint servers? Suggestion: Still the boundary of the block level element. Line styling could be done by setting width/height or x2/y2 on gradients or patterns.

I'm fine with this.  We can always have a property that controls this
in the future if it's needed.

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 16:47:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:47 UTC