Re: Turning image interpolation off.

I'd also like to see this specified but the image-rendering property from
SVG is more of a hint than a requirement:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/single-page.html#painting-ImageRenderingProperty

A CSS property of the same name is in the pipeline to fix this:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images/#the-image-rendering
(http://crbug.com/317991 is now tracking this in Chromium/Blink)



On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com> wrote:

> While attempting to write a test case for my implementation of
> <feConvolveMatrix>, I was wanting to display an image without any
> filtering/interpolation.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
>      width="100%" height="100%" viewBox="0 0 17 17" >
>
>   <defs>
>     <filter id="test1" filterRes="3" x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1">
>       <feConvolveMatrix order="3" kernelMatrix="0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 3 0.5 0.5
> 0.5 0.5"/>
>     </filter>
>
>   </defs>
>
>   <image x="7" y="2" width="3" height="3" xlink:href="swatch3x3.png"
> filter="url(#test1)"/>
>
> </svg>
>
>
> Unfortunately, all the browsers (WK/FF/IE) interpolate even when
> image-rendering="optimizeSpeed" is applied.
>
> After a bit of research, I gather that some browsers supported
> (past-tense) an "optimize-contrast" option for "image-rendering". What
> happened to that?
>
> In any case, should there be a way to force non-interpolated rendering?
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>