- From: Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:44:05 +1200
- To: Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfsppAgw8AFcUDRncN6hD6TKKALQwM5mOZ1zm7j-zLOxQtEkA@mail.gmail.com>
As you suggested, I have created a bug. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22457 Paul On 26 June 2013 02:02, Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com> wrote: > Paul, > > That was the wrong bit of the overflow text. As this is the outermost or > root element we clip per this bit... > > - When an outermost svg element<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/intro.html#TermOutermostSVGElement>is stand-alone or embedded inline within a parent XML grammar which does > not use CSS layout or XSL formatting, the ‘overflow’<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/masking.html#OverflowProperty>property on the outermost > svg element<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/intro.html#TermOutermostSVGElement>is ignored for the purposes of visual rendering and the initial clipping > path is set to the bounds of the initial viewport<http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html#SVGViewport> > . > > As to the "*If the SVG fragment identifier addresses a ‘view’ element > within an SVG document then the closest ancestor ‘svg’ element is displayed > in the viewport*" I didn't understand it either so I ignored it when I > implemented it ;-) Raise a bug in bugzilla if you want and if we can agree > on something that makes sense that is in accord with other UAs I'll think > about implementing it if I can understand what to do. > > Robert. > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 16:44:52 UTC