- From: Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:38:42 +1200
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 21:39:29 UTC
Hi all I have noticed that there seems to be some inconsistency among renderers on how to handle <view> elements. In particular, I have noticed two issues. Issue #1: the viewBox Chrome, Firefox and IE appear to render the document as if the viewBox of the <view> has replaced the viewBox of the <svg>. Meaning that a length of "100%" spans the <view> rather than the <svg>. In Batik, this doesn't happen. "100%" is calculated from the <svg> viewport. Issue #2: clipping Chrome, FF and IE clip to the <view> whereas Batik does not. Neither the 1.1 or the 2 spec define exactly what is supposed to happen (for either issue). Is it perhaps worth clarifying this? My personal view is that Batik is correct. Paul
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 21:39:29 UTC