- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:20:16 +1300
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 22:20:45 UTC
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>wrote: > Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> One issue with any approach to SVG glyphs that someone brought up on my >> blog is that SVG doesn't support any kind of hinting so it'll probably be >> difficult to create SVG glyphs that look good at low resolutions. >> >> When this has been raised in the past, the official line has been that > anti-aliasing has removed the need. > For small-sized font glyphs (or SVG images for that matter, such as icons scaled to a small size), I don't believe it. Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 22:20:45 UTC