- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:25:12 -0800
- To: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDC7gz3Z+PtF_XLhqgv86bsCfKF+B319c3usnFwmew+mQg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the review Tav. I applied your comments and posted a new ED: http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1/ On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr> wrote: > On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 14:54 -0800, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > During last week's call [1] David Baron mentioned that the compositing > > and blending specification didn't declare the mathematical operations > > as normative. > > I went back over when I made this change but couldn't retrace why this > > was done (or who told me to do so). > > > > > > I agree with David that this should be declared normative and made > > changes to the editor's draft so those section are now normative [2]. > > I also updated those sections to clarify what are notes, examples and > > required/normative behavior. > > > > > > Does anyone disagree with this change? > > If not, I would like to ask for another Last Call on the next SVG and > > CSS telecon with a duration of 4 weeks. > > Sounds good. > > > In addition, I also > > - removed the paragraph on knockout (per Simon Fraser's request) > > - removed the section on clip-to-self and references to it (per James > > Robinson's and roc's request) > > - clarified section on SVG compositing and ordering of examples and > > figures (per Tav's request) > > Examples numbering still skips numbers in Firefox (but not Chrome). > 'class=example' occurs both on <div>s and the <img>s inside which > appears to mess up the auto-counting. > > > Minor editing quibbles: > > Abstract: > Add period after: * compositing groups. > > 3.4: > <blend-mode> = .... should be broken into two lines so it doesn't run > off-screen. > > Third example: > ... element is causing ... -> > ... element causes ... > > 3.4.2: > In CSS, a background ... -> > A CSS background image or the content of an <img> must... > [<img> is HTML, not CSS] > > Question: what about <iframe>, <object>, <embed>? > Those elements must not caused isolation. Note that this paragraph is marked "at-risk" since current implementations don't seem to cause isolation. > > 3.4.3: > Subject/verb agreement: > > ... blend with the element's background layer that is below it ... OR > ... blend with the element's background layers that are below it ... > > the element instead -> the element, instead > > 5. Note: > Shape either exists at a particular point or it does not. -> > A particular point is either inside the shape or it is not. > > The note should be divided into two paragraphs; one for shape, one for > opacity. > > 10: Blending, example caption: > > Note ... lowers. -> > Note how the rectangle is redder where the opacity of the background is > smaller. > > General: > > I find the use of <br> in the middle of a <p> makes the spec more > difficult to read; for example, in 3.4.2 between the first and second > sentence. They should be removed or replaced by <p> depending on how > closely the material before and after is related. > I agree. I went over the spec and tried to clean this up
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 19:25:47 UTC