Re: [dom] Comments on heycam's new SVG DOM

Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Oh yes, another suggestion which made my friend in Chrome Security
> almost weep in happiness:
> Let's kill the instance tree for<use>  in the new DOM.  animVal and
> the instanceTree constitute nearly the entirety of SVG's horrible
> security/crashiness in our implementation, and I doubt we're very
> unique.  The instance tree is also the big thing preventing us from
> just re-explaining<use>  in terms of Shadow DOM.

I think we've already decided to do that (cast <use> as a Shadow DOM 
thing).  The work hasn't been done yet though.

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 21:56:17 UTC