- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:12:12 +0100
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
David Dailey wrote: > > Agreed completely. The 1990's era concept that presentation, behavior, and > appearance were all separate silos of activity was a cute metaphor for a > 20th century world filled with hypertext flowed into rectilinear cells. In a > larger world, like SVG should be, the three are all part of the "meaning" of > an expression. Of course such late 20th century thinking was the mindset One of the big changes in the cultural background is that legislators have taken an interest in accessibility, and that generally requires that meaning be separable from presentation, which is something which HTML was designed for, but, in my view, SVG only pays lip service to. Otherwise, I'd suggest that the real changes in technology have been on the hardware side (faster, more memory) and there hasn't really been much of a change in what commercial content creators want. In fact some of the very early design decisions on HTML were deliberately at odds with the commercial tools of the day. (Another cultural changes seems to be "top" posting!) -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 12:12:44 UTC