- From: Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:42:41 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
On 10-04-13 02:58, Cameron McCormack wrote: > ... > Changes since the previous draft can be seen highlighted in yellow in > the Changes appendix: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-SVG2-20130409/changes.html > > Comments to this mailing list are welcome. With regards to how to handle miter limit for "arcs" joins, why not simply cap the arcs at at the miter limit? So you don't revert to either bevel or miter, but as soon as the arcs become longer than the miter limit (either in arc-length, or in terms of the distance between starting and ending points) you cut them off and draw a straight line between the two endpoints. The main advantage is that you don't have discontinuous behaviour. As the join gets larger and larger you don't suddenly snap back to either a bevel or miter, but the join is simply cut off beyond the miter limit. Also, it's hardly more difficult to falling back to different behaviour. (The same could be used for miter joins btw.)
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 07:43:12 UTC