- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:55:20 -0700
- To: Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Reading the current draft, there seems to be an inconsistency. While 'r' is not allowed to be negative, there seems to be no restriction for 'fr' [1]. Is that the intention? As a note, Canvas gradient does not allow to be any radius negative[2]. Greetings, Dirk [1] https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/pservers.html#RadialGradientElementFRAttribute [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/#dom-context-2d-createradialgradient On Sep 4, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl> wrote: > On 2012-09-04 18:06, Rik Cabanier wrote: >> ... We also need to call out what happens with alpha once the circles >> start overlapping. >> I think use expectation is that the gradient does not interact with >> itself. > Good point. This also has bearing on negative radii. If a future spec > would allow negative radii it probably should not let "overlapped" > circles shine through (if it would, then it would clash with the current > interpretation, as the "bottom" half of the double cone would need to be > visible). >
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2012 00:55:56 UTC