- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:47:12 -0500
- To: Nikos Andronikos <nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Nikos- On 11/29/12 11:32 PM, Nikos Andronikos wrote: > On 30/11/2012 12:41 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: ... >> >> This is reasonable for HTML, but not for SVG. It needs a lot of >> specification work either. > > Forgetting the comparisons between HTML and SVG, I think allowing a > drawing element to establish a new viewport and being able to place > objects within that viewport makes total sense for a graphics language. > It's possible now, but this is a more elegant way of doing it imo. Thanks. I didn't mean to draw too close a comparison to HTML... this isn't really analogous at all. The essence of my proposal (which isn't really original to me, BTW... it's something I've heard numerous times before) is simply a new way of grouping rendered elements. (BTW, I couldn't find anywhere in SVG1.1 that explicitly says that child elements of a graphical shape don't render... am I missing something?) Regards- -Doug
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 04:47:28 UTC