Re: mask-type property

Dirk Schulze:
> Yeah, we can think about it again. I am not really opposed to a
> different solutions. However, I think it is reasonable to use the
> same property. Masks don't apply to <mask> elements anyway at the
> moment.

It would mean we couldn't then ever make them apply to <mask> elements.
I don't know how likely it is that we'll ever want to do that, but it
contributes to my unease over using the same property for two different
things.

Let's talk about it briefly in the telcon next week to see if anyone 
else feels similarly; if not, I'm OK to go ahead with it, and I'll land 
my patch for mask-type on <mask>. :)

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 03:44:33 UTC