Re: filter effect shorthand syntax

Dirk Schulze:
> I fear the topic was totally different then the snippet might look like. It was just about the short name of the spec. That is important for the final link once it reaches TR state. Something like
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/Filter Effects/
>
> might be inconsistent to other specs. The resolution was to use "filter-effects" instead of "Filter Effects". So it will be
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/filter-effects/
>
> and mails will be prefixed with [filter-effects] instead of [Filter Effects]

OK, makes sense (remembering that W3C people must approve our choice of 
short name, though it's rarely a problem). :)

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 04:08:52 UTC