- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 21:20:08 -0400
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 09:50 +1000, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Liam R E Quin: > > It's not really clear to me how to interpret (x, y, w, h) for SVG either > [...] > Making that clear would presumably also be a change to SVG. > > We discussed in the SVG telcon today broadening SVG's id="" to allow > values other than XML Names, to align with HTML. That would mean we > would need to special case media fragment syntax and SVG view > specifications not to be interpreted as IDs, but I think that would be fine. It makes sense, although watch that people could use xpointer in fragment identifiers. > I don't think media fragments would "supersede" SVG, since we still need > #svgView(...) to work. So the SVG spec will need to be updated to > ensure we choose between interpreting the fragment as an SVG view > specification, a media fragment, or an ID. (Regardless of whether we > need to update the media type registration.) +1 -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 01:20:28 UTC