- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:59:52 -0700
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
On 07/05/2012 04:07 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr.: >> Media Fragments were designed for arbitrary media. It wouldn't make >> much sense to use something named "svgView()" on a PNG, after all. >> ^_^ Even if it duplicates existing specced functionality in SVG, it >> would be nice if MF syntax worked on SVG as well as raster images. > > I did no test here, if we assume, that available viewers indicate problems > with fragment identifiers like id="xywh=" or id="t=..." anyway, > no author will have used such structures, allowed or not. > And even if some viewers might accept 'wrong' values for id (I think, some > do), the probability that someone used such values will be low, is my > guess. Therefore indeed, it might not cause any/relevant backwards > incompatibility problems, if such an addition to indicate another view > of the document in SVG2 is defined respectively referenced. > Obviously for SVG 1.0, 1.1 and tiny 1.2 this is still wrong and > authors nevertheless have to use for example > sprites.svg#svgView(viewBox(40,0,20,20)) > to get the intended effect. This is a spec for implementers, not a tutorial for authors. The examples show what is intended to work if the spec were implemented, which is not necessarily what is implemented and ready for production use. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 16:00:29 UTC