- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:53:24 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
On 2/3/12 10:29 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I see no reason not to allow it on arbitrary content. It would be > useful. You'd have to define all sorts of interactions (e.g. what happens if a kid of a display:table-row has display:none but also your new property?). It _might_ be useful, but is it useful enough to justify going through the whole spec with a fine-toothed comb fixing all the places where it adds complexity? If you haven't read http://dbaron.org/log/20100531-specs you should. ;) -Boris
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 16:54:07 UTC