- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:51:37 -0500
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Dr. Olaf- On 12/1/12 12:01 PM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > > there was already some discussion about new > path commands in SVG2 to simplify the work > of authors. > I propose to introduce a new path command > as an extension of the commands S and Z. > > This closes a subpath similar to the Z command, > but not with a straight line. It uses a cubic > curve like the S command. The first control > point it determined by the previous point and > its direction as for the S command. > The second control point is determined in a > similar way, but the first point of the subpath > that has to be closed is used and its direction. > The resulting effect is, that it is simpler for > authors to close shapes in a smooth way without > a corner. > Today authors have to compute especially the > second control point manually to get this effect. > With some knowlegde in analysis (mathematics), this > is not difficult, but unfortunately it cannot be > assumed, that all authors have such capabilities. > > If information about the direction to determine the > control points is not available, corresponding rules > as for S apply (typically with the result, that there > will be corners again, but to avoid this is usually a > simple task for authors). This seems very sensible to me. > Suggestions for naming: > Because 'ß' (ligature for 'sz') would be only an intuitive > name for german speaking people, maybe another name > would be more preferable like 'Y' or 'R'. 'O' would be very > suggestive, but can be mixed up with '0' (zero). 'B' would be > another, less suggestive choice, but with less problems as 'O'. The name would probably be the hardest part of this to decide... :P So, I suggest we consider the functionality first, then try to decide a command after. Regards- -Doug
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2012 19:51:45 UTC