- From: Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:20:18 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
> This depreciation was added in the second edition of SVG 1.1. > I think anyway, a second edition is the wrong place to depreciate > something. And one has to take into account, that animateColor works > in viewers with serious efforts to interprete animation in SVG properly, > why to remove something, that works without problems for about 10 years? Because it's pointless and makes viewers more complicated for no reason. > They have to note, that such programs are not advanced enough > to interprete their content and have to suggest interested users to use > more advanced programs, this is annoying and a waste of time both for > authors and users and only a result of these absurd depreciation > discussions about features, that already work pretty good in many viewers. Only authors that can't be bothered to change animateColor to animate need to do that. A simple search and replace script would fix things for them. Best regards Robert.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 10:20:51 UTC