- From: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:11:12 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEi838kroNR1dLhFWwgEYJtNU_V-_T66q4iVLngA7HqE4ZqKwA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi SVG WG :) 2012/8/29 Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-**SVG2-20120828/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-SVG2-20120828/> > Nice to see SVG 2 FPWD out :) I know it's a very early WD but here are some small quick thought about it: - Section 1.6 I'm looking forward for the definition of "lacuna value" but I'm not sure it is quite différente than "default value" which seams a bit more easier to understand. - Section 2.3 It is stated that SVG can be embedded in an HTML page using the img element or throught CSS. Is their a normative reference somewhere that define the limit of SVG embedded that way? For exemple, Firefox does not allow scripts or external ressources in such cases. If this normative reference exist it would be nice to have a link to it. If it does not exist, it worth considering writing it in order to help implementor to define common behaviors. - Section 4.4 Maybe it would be worth considering to reference css3-color instead of having the list of color keywords. Maybe this should be part of chapter 12. - Section 5.7 Maybe it miss an annotation about http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input#.3Cuse.3E_cleanup? - Section 23 Maybe it miss an annotation about http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input#Extensibility? I hope this will help Best regards -- Jeremie ............................. Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 13:12:05 UTC