- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:39:28 -0700
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Also, we should try to be as consistent with Madia fragments[1]. This is necessary for CSS and HTML integration. Greetings, Dirk [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ On Aug 27, 2012, at 4:27 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Daniel Holbert: >> But the same logic would apply to viewBox -- you could easily use %20 >> instead of spaces there, too, but the spec says you have to use commas. >> Should we nix the special-case comma syntax there as well? > > Hmm. Have you tested other implementations to see if they accept commas > inside viewBox()? > >> I'd argue we should mandate the same can't-use-spaces-workaround across >> all of the components of svgView(). I don't particularly care whether >> we use %20 or commas (or either?), but I think we should be consistent >> on that. > > I agree consistency here is preferable. >
Received on Monday, 27 August 2012 23:40:02 UTC