- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:48:07 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>, "www-svg@w3.org list" <www-svg@w3.org>, Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>
On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes, (0, 100) should be the correct answer. It would be great if we >>> could change to align with IE and Opera here, so that answer has a >>> majority and FF can change. >> >> Well, it depends on the interpretation of ""A negative value is an error. A value of zero disables rendering of the >> element". Actually it says it should not be rendered. So no renderer is created, like for display: none? I would interpret it as not rendering, no renderer, no bounding box. So FF and Webkit behavior sound reasonable before. >> >> We had bug reports for that on WebKit before and discussed it with people from Mozilla and they had the same understanding. > > On the other hand, the spec states that the answer should be > independent of whether the element has been rendered yet or not. It's > much more useful, I think, if the element doesn't have a discontinuity > here. The same would apply for display:none then. Dirk > > ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 02:48:35 UTC