- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:00:04 -0700
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
(Apologies for not chiming in earlier here - for some reason I never got subscribed to www-svg when I joined the WG. This has been remedied.) I strongly agree that gradients should paint in 0width or 0height bounding boxes. The gradient is still conceptually well-defined in these cases. For linear gradients with spreadmethod=pad, if the gradient is aligned exactly opposite the bbox, it's just 0-length, and thus defines a two-color image (the color of the first <stop> and the color of the last <stop>). Otherwise, it's identical to if the gradient was aligned with the bbox and was the length of the bbox. For radial gradients with spreadmethod=pad, it always defines a solid-color image with the color of the last <stop>. spreadmethod=reflect or repeat are more difficult, though, because there is no first or last <stop>, conceptually. Right now, CSS Images punts on the issue and requires repeating gradients to clamp their width to a minimum of 1px. I'm open to better solutions, though (weighted average?), and would like to ensure that CSS gradients align with SVG gradients here. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 23 July 2011 01:00:50 UTC