- From: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:54:21 -0400
- To: "'www-svg'" <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003f01cc40ff$c8a0a0b0$59e1e210$@net>
Take a look at this screen shot of five modern browsers rendering a relatively simple SVG file with one text tag having various text effects applied: http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/text/FancyTextBrowsers.jpg I must surely get some sort of prize for maximizing the ratio of Sum(BrowserDiscrepancies) / SVGFileSize . The browsers depicted are (clockwise from upper left): Opera, Firefox, Chrome, IE9, and Safari. The raw file (barebones version ) is at http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/text/textfeatures.svg (Though the one depicted in the screen shots is actually http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/text/textplay.svg . ) I think much of what we're seeing here stems from lack of specification rather than bugs, though bugs appear to be ample as well. The operative text tag reads as follows: <text id="T" fill="none" stroke-width="4" stroke="url(#g)" stroke-opacity="1" font-family="serif" font-stretch="ultra-expanded" stroke-dasharray="10 5" rotate="-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20" textLength="90" lengthAdjust="spacingAndGlyphs" font-style="oblique" text-decoration="overline" font-size="50" x="5" y="65%" font-weight="bold"> Conclusions: 1. Firefox doesn't yet handle overline or textLength="90" lengthAdjust="spacingAndGlyphs" . I am pretty confident that these are known bugs and not surprises. textLength, though is rather important since it seems to be the only way (short of converting text to paths) of making sure that text will occupy roughly the same footprint on different sized devices. 2. The browsers don't seem to agree on what units to use (pixels or viewport) for dash array when applied to text. 3. The browsers don't seem to agree on whether overline and glyphs use the same dash-array units or not. 4. The extent of the spread of the gradient through the text seems in some cases to be based on total cumulative path length of the glyphs rather than on each glyphs own horizontal size. Note the difference in gradient spread across the four browsers where we can see the completion. IE hits the final stop at about .8, while Opera does the expected thing at about .9; Chrome hits it at about .1 and Safari only reaches the final stop color in its overline. Only Opera seems to keep the gradients of the overline and the text in sync. 5. Commencement values of the dash-array seem to be differently calculated for different glyphs than for others in some browsers. 6. The overline is discontiguous in most browsers. 7. Rotations of the overline follow rotations of the glyphs in most browsers. Opera does it as I would expect. 8. The baseline of the phrase seems to droop from left to right in some browsers. It appears to be nonlinear in others. The simpler file (with the guidelines at the bottom make this clearer). 9. Some browsers allow the rotated glyphs to begin outside the drawing area, others interpret textLength and spacingandGlyphs obviously differently. Hope this adds more clarity than confusion, as that is the goal. Regards David
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 01:54:51 UTC