- From: <peasthope@shaw.ca>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:06:50 -0700
- To: www-svg@w3.org, peasthope@shaw.ca
- Cc: peasthope@shaw.ca
Hello Dr. Hoffmann,
From: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:01:17 +0100
> I think, the prefix contruction with always
> having <svg:element-name> in
> XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1 ...
>
> If you put the xmlns attribute with the value
> for SVG in each topmost svg element ...
OK, thanks. I accept the need for unambiguous identification of a namespace.
Conversely, I am interested to use the namespace prefix where
not necessary in a *.svg document. In principle, this should
work but gives an error message.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd" [ ] >
<svg
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xml:lang="en"
width="134"
height="242"
overflow="visible"
style="font-family:Times; font-size:20">
<svg:text x='40' y='-50' >1</svg:text>
</svg>
If the two instances of "svg:" are removed, the above text validates.
Is there any simple way to make the above validate without removing
the "svg:" prefixes?
Thanks for any ideas, ... Peter E.
--
Telephone 1 360 450 2132.
Shop pages http://carnot.yi.org/ accessible as long as the old drives survive.
Personal pages http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/ .
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 22:07:07 UTC