- From: KUROSAWA, Takeshi <taken.spc@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:50:54 +0900
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi Cameron, Thank you for all your hard work. I confirmed the most parts of the issue are now fixed. However I noticed there are some "URI"s in current editor's draft. http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/animate.html#TargetElement > xlink:href = "<iri>" > An URI reference to the element which... ^^^ http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/struct.html#ImageElementHrefAttribute > xlink:href = "<uri>" ^^^ http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/struct.html#__svg__SVGSVGElement__useCurrentView > ... - see Linking into SVG content: URI fragments and SVG views). ^^^ Thanks, On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Kurosawa-san, > > Takeshi KUROSAWA: >> > I found "a IRI" in many places within SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call Working >> > I Draft: believe they are typos. > > Chris Lilley: >> Yes, this is an error (caused by find and replace). The correct >> wording is "an IRI". We will fix these occurrences. >> >> > BTW, "URI reference" is used in some other places while the term >> > "URI references" is not defined. >> >> These should also be "an IRI" rather than "a URI reference". >> >> Thanks for bringing these to our attention. Your comment is tracked as >> ISSUE-2376 > > Thanks for your comment. These issues have now been fixed. See for > example: > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/linking.html#IRIandURI > > For completeness, could you please indicate whether these changes have > been made to your satisfication? > > Thanks, > > Cameron > > -- > Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/ > -- Kurosawa Takeshi <taken.spc@gmail.com>
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 02:51:24 UTC