- From: Frederik Elwert <frederik.elwert@web.de>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:16:43 +0100
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Am Donnerstag, den 06.01.2011, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Dr. Olaf Hoffmann: > Frederik Elwert: > > >So my questions are: > > > > * Is my original approach valid at all? > > Yes, however due to accuracy problems and because it is > simpler for current viewers, it is often more practical to > use for both animations begin="start.click" end="stop.click". > Anyway, there should be no problem with syncbase-values, > if a browser/viewer has implemented, what is defined in SMIL ;o) Ok, thanks for the feedback! So it is not my original idea, but implementations that are flawed. I will use the proposed solution for now. > (Another option to simplify things is to use no style attribute and to > note everything in presentation attributes. With this already tiny-viewers > should manage the sample including animation, not just full-viewers - > but this simplification is not much related to your animation issue.) Yes, sure, I was just using a quick Inkscape generated sample file which is not exactly optimized in every way. > > * Are there better solutions? > Help implementors to fix bugs ;o) I reported the bug to Opera, let’s see if they fix it. Thanks again, Frederik
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 14:17:48 UTC