Re: [css-style-attr] SVG WG comments on CSS Styling Attributes Level 1 from Christoph Päper on 2010-09-03 (www-svg@w3.org from September 2010)

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:20:38 +0200
To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2E63EC5B-DBF3-47FF-A61C-CD44ED7FA1D5@crissov.de>

David Singer:
> Unless [e notation] introduces problems stronger than 'don't like' / 'don't need' (e.g. the presence of the 'e' seriously complicates other parts of the grammar), we should introduce it and move on.

As shown before I believe it only doesn’t introduce grammar problems when not followed by a unit identifier. So, perhaps, allow ‘1e0’ but don’t spec ‘1e0em’.

Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 10:21:13 UTC