- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:26:56 +1000
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Cc: Nikolas Zimmermann <zimmermann@physik.rwth-aachen.de>, www-svg@w3.org
Hi Shane, --Original Message--: >Hi Alex, > >So Opera's rendering (both examples render in the same way) is >correct, and WebKit has a bug? Yes from what I expect. Niko's other comment about the path and rect both doing motion is what's expected. The parent <svg> is the thing being 'animateMotion'ed. Alex >Cheers, > -Shane > >On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> wrote: >> Hi Niko & Shane, >> >> Now I see the difference, child relationships. >> >> Anyway see inline: >> >> --Original Message--: >>>Hi Shane, >>> >>>I think you are misunderstanding something: >>> >>>> <path d="M-25,-12.5 L25,-12.5 L 0,-87.5 z" fill="yellow" >>>> stroke="red" stroke-width="7.06" id="MyTriangle" > >>>> </path> >>>> <animateMotion dur="6s" repeatCount="indefinite" rotate="auto" > >>>> <mpath xlink:href="#path1"/> >>>> </animateMotion> >>> >>>This example is not correct, how shall the user agent know to which >>>element the animation should be applied? >>>It works as expected if you'd assign xlink:href="#MyTriangle" to your >>><animateMotion> element. >> >> The animateMotion should be applied to the parent element which in >> that case is the <svg>. Since that's a container element all the >> content should have the animateMotion applied. So the example is OK. >> >>>You either have to specify a target for your animation element using >>>xlink:href=#someIRI" or include it as child element of the target >>>element. >>>I just played a bit around with your test in Opera, and it's confusing: >>> >>>If I try: >>> <path d="M-25,-12.5 L25,-12.5 L 0,-87.5 z" fill="yellow", >>>stroke="red" stroke-width="7.06" id="MyTriangle"/> >>><rect width="30" height="30"/> >>> <animateMotion dur="6s" repeatCount="indefinite" rotate="auto" >>> ><mpath xlink:href="#path1"/></animateMotion> >>> >>>Then Opera animates both the path & the rect, using the same >>>animateMotion operation. >>>Sounds like a bug to me, unless I'm missing some SMIL detail. Erik? >>> >>> >>>> <path d="M-25,-12.5 L25,-12.5 L 0,-87.5 z" fill="yellow" >>>> stroke="red" stroke-width="7.06" id="MyTriangle" > >>>> <animateMotion dur="6s" repeatCount="indefinite" rotate="auto" > >>>> <mpath xlink:href="#path1"/> >>>> </animateMotion> >>>> </path> >>> >>>Here, you are including the animateMotion element as <path> child, so >>>it works fine. >> >> Yes, but in the other case, the <svg> is just a parent container and so it >> should host the motion for its child <path>. >> >> Alex >> >>>Cheers, >>>Niko >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 07:27:42 UTC