- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:48:54 +1000
- To: Robert Longson <longsonr@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de
Hi Robert, --Original Message--: >Olaf, > >> And note, that the 't' in the name of the file and the doctype indicate, >> that it is a test using the tiny profile. >> And for this profile the value of 'font-size' has never units. > >We're concerned with the full profile here. > >http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlSVGWeb_local/animate-elem-46-t.html > >1.1F2 suggests to me that this is for 1.1 full 2 > >If not we also have... > >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20061213/htmlObjectHarness/full-animate-elem-46-t.html > >And they are all the same i.e. neither attributeType="XML" nor units. > >> And even for a document using the full profile, one can use units, >> but there is no need to do it in this example - to add 'px' or >> attributeType only increases the file size with no effect. > >We're claiming that the syntax for a CSS property requires units per >the CSS specification but the equivalent XML attribute does not per >the SVG specification so there is a difference. Interesting to note that the first SVG tag has: <svg version="1.1" baseProfile="tiny" ... So for upward compatibility reasons perhaps that is something that has not been considered in the light of Tiny vs. Full viewers and what to do when encountering the baseProfile (which I assume most viewers ignore). We clearly have some disconnect in the Tiny->Basic->Full profiles. Alex >Best regards > >Robert. > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 09:50:40 UTC