- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:26:21 +0200
- To: "Alex Danilo" <alex@abbra.com>, "Patrick Dengler" <patd@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 04:09:16 +0200, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > --Original Message--: >> In general, as I go through these tests, it seems that well over 50% of >> the items that have not yet been accepted are broken or simply not >> there. This should be of huge concern for delivering a quality spec. >> I've listed the issues I ran into while working on the additional set I >> said I would get on my flights back. >> >> >> Issues >> #-1 ) This is a key issue. Why is it that struct-use-01-t.html shows >> non-italic text in the comparison image, and yet italic text in every >> browser except Opera, when it plainly says italic? ... > The 1.2 Tiny test references the external SVG font which has no italic > face > so the viewers fall back to the normal glyphs in the SVG font. Yes, I've made sure that the testcase now references an SVG font that does have a bold italic face defined. Note that there's no requirement AFAIK forcing implementations to do fake bold / fake italic. I've also updated the reference image. > We need to > check CSS for the font selection here (I can't remember off the top of > my head what the rules are). A viewer could easily synthesize an oblique > version of the SVG font if needed for the 1.2 Tiny case. It could. But it's not a requirement to synthesize such font faces AFAIK. ... >> My understanding was that these images were being snapped from a vender >> neutral process. Did I get that wrong? > > As far as I know they are - most likely Batik which is an Apache project. Yes, I can confirm that it was generated by Batik (the version we use is checked into the cvs under SVG/tools[1]) >> If not, I would like to have all of the .png's for tests that IE passes >> from IE. Is that cool? I am sure I can get these quickly. Traditionally we have only used binary image-patches when absolutely necessary, the preferred format is a static SVG image-patch that makes Batik produce the appropriate rendering, see [2] and [3]. Cheers /Erik [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/tools/batik/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/imagePatches/ [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/script/generate_reference_images.pl -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 16:27:06 UTC