W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2010

Re: SVG Fonts [...]

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 03:21:20 +1200
Message-ID: <AANLkTilYigIFhT9VctlL0yjmx8tz0wadKdnAhTuVEsCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> On Thursday, June 3, 2010, 12:52:26 AM, Robert wrote:
> ROC> In general SVG fonts are going to be lower quality, in terms of
> rasterization.
> You have stated that without demonstration. What is your source for the
> statement?

1) The format does not support hinting
2) AFAIK no SVG viewer today renders SVG Fonts with subpixel antialiasing

ROC>  Of course, if there is no such option or viewers to not interprete
> ROC>  this option, many authors will just use a feature from programs
> ROC>  like inkscape to convert text into inaccessible paths, difficult to
> edit
> ROC>  afterwards and not readable anymore without the graphical
> ROC>  representation.

Olaf wrote that, not me. Sorry if Gmail broke the formatting.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Saturday, 5 June 2010 16:13:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:26 UTC