- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:35:15 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>, "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4C073103.8050003@jumis.com>
On 6/2/10 8:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > > When was the last time a web developer designed so much as one > glyph in an Opentype font? > Have you? > > > Nope. But there are an awful lot of Opentype fonts around, and people > spend a lot of time making them. > > Yet Illustrator, Corel Draw, Inkscape _all_ generate content with > SVG fonts. > > > How often to people use them to generate SVG fonts, though? Or SVG at all? This has to do with opening a file and displaying it; nothing to do with the generation of fonts. You can translate fonts across standards, it is, at times, a lossy process. There's a reasonable chance of success, of processing an SVG file using ECMAScript and existing browsers. Rendering an SVG file with some fidelity to the embedded profile, whether falling back on VML, the HTML Canvas Tag, or other technology, is doable with SVG Fonts, and far more difficult with only a WOFF binary. SVG Fonts can make for a single, compact file. The <use> tag hasn't been a winner in that scenario. Though lacking typical typography features (hinting, etc) it's easier on implementers than open type. ... You can certainly take an open type font, convert it to a basic SVG Font (lacking a lot of data), and use it quickly in an illustration, and share that one illustration as one .svg file. Font authoring environments don't seem relevant; if the authoring environment is in-browser; we again stumble on the issue. By committing solely to WOFF, SVG - ECMAScript font generation would be hackish at best, as would embedded font resources. WOFF could work with with data:-url, but that's stretching things. In most cases, an SVG file will not include the full font, but only a subset of glyphs, possibly to be viewed independently of a web browser. For mass distribution, on internet-connected sites, mainly for HTML, WOFF fonts make a lot more sense, of course. So do other binary file formats, and I'm glad to see WOFF accepted. And I'm glad to see an HTML+SVG profile becoming more of a reality. -Charles
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 04:35:46 UTC