- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:44:03 -0800
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim+st9vwWqgr5N6qGJK5Fp8amxUs-DnomiKJbw1@mail.gmail.com>
That's an unintuitive, er, interesting result. (I haven't read the CSS3 Transforms spec in any detail but it's interesting that all browsers that I tested exhibit the same behavior) Jeff On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote: > On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:00:16 +0100, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> > wrote: > > http://codedread.com/browser-tests/subpixel.svg >> >> Just want to confirm that there should be two tiny words on this page. >> >> 1) Firefox 3.6 and IE9 display both words the same sizes as expected >> 2) WebKit has a bug with font sizes below 0.5px (displaying the 0.4999px >> text larger) >> 3) Opera fails to display either words >> >> As usual, it's disturbing to find such a basic test not exhibiting >> cross-browser consistency at this stage of SVG deployment, but thankfully >> there are at least two implementations in this case :-/ >> >> Is there a test to cover this in the suite? >> > > There's no such test AFAIK. > > I was curious to see if the same issue could be seen when using CSS3 2d > transforms and a small font-size in html content, see attachment. > > Cheers > /Erik > > -- > Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software > Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group > Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 16:44:52 UTC