- From: Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:03:47 -0400
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:18:52 +0200, Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com> wrote: > New spec text is as follows: > [[ Start a new sub-path at the given (x,y) coordinate. M (uppercase) > indicates that absolute coordinates will follow; m (lowercase) indicates > that relative coordinates will follow. If a moveto is followed by multiple > pairs of coordinates, the subsequent pairs are treated as implicit lineto > commands. Hence, implicit lineto commands will be relative if the moveto is > relative, and absolute if the moveto is absolute. If a relative moveto (m) > appears as the first element of the path, then it is treated as a pair of > absolute coordinates. In this case, subsequent pairs of coordinates are > treated as relative even though the initial moveto is interpreted as an > absolute moveto. ]] > > ... >> >> I haven't tested browsers, I would be willing to expend the effort if >> any interest is shown. > > We have one new test for this spec change, but you are most welcome to do > further testing (and help us improve the testsuite). Thanks Erik. The new definition looks clear (it agrees with me!) and the test is comprehensive. I think it's handled. New tests would be best implemented for untested issues. I notice the test for this shows red on failure, it someone was thinking in the beginning, they all would. > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/paths-data-16-t.svg > > Cheers > /Erik > -- Cheers! Rick
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 20:12:37 UTC