On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote: > What you are suggesting is to allow the filter primitive subregion to be > larger than the filter region, so calling it 'subregion' sounds wrong to me > (editorial, but still, if that change is made I'd like to call it 'filter > primitive region' instead). > Sounds reasonable. > Regarding clipping to the subregion, is it your opinion then that this > clipping should take place on the filter input image, on the filter output > image, or both? (For e.g feDisplacementMap this can make quite a difference) The output. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 09:12:10 UTC