- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:38:29 +0200
- To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:35:51 +0200, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2010Apr/0031.html ... > 1) All browsers except for WebKit parse the elliptical-arc-argument > production as: > > elliptical-arc-argument: > nonnegative-number comma-wsp? nonnegative-number comma-wsp? > number comma-wsp flag comma-wsp? flag comma-wsp? coordinate-pair > > i.e. a comma-wsp? between the two flags and between the sweep-flag and > the coordinate-pair. Right, thanks for pointing that out. The gist of what I said in that telcon was that I believed it to be simple to update the spec grammar to reflect the intent (for the elliptical arc grammar). It's now been updated (as part of ACTION-2754), see http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/paths.html#PathDataBNF. > 2) WebKit also accepts values for 'flag' other than "0" or "1" (and > interprets anything other than "1" as a "0"). I've looked at the > code. No change has been made in the spec for that bit. > Since Firefox, Opera, Batik and IE9 all support the above, I guess it > would make sense for WebKit to align with this for interoperability. > I will raise a bug against WebKit. Is there a ruling on which spec > will be updated for this? Can we get an official word from the SVG WG > so I can link to it? The change was committed to the SVG 1.1 second edition spec[1], along with a new test[2]. Cheers /Erik [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/paths.html#PathDataBNF [2] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObject/paths-data-20-f.html -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 08:39:07 UTC