W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Changing attributeType="CSS"

From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:29:00 +1100
Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E3D1DCB8-F7A6-40E2-A9BF-2A781E53A050@apple.com>
To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>

On 31/10/2009, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote:

>> And looking in the current CSS transition draft indeed the opposite  
>> is true,
>> there are only a few properties indicated to be animatable,
> I only looked in CSS animations for restrictions and saw none - I  
> erroneously
> assumed that the same was true of transitions. Anyway, my point is  
> that I don't
> see any need to restrict what SMIL can animate relative to *either*  
> of these CSS
> proposals.

I recently updated the CSS transitions specification to simply refer  
to SVG for the list of animatable properties. It was never the  
intention to produce a restricted set.

Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 05:29:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:24 UTC