- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:29:00 +1100
- To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
- Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, www-svg@w3.org
On 31/10/2009, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote: >> And looking in the current CSS transition draft indeed the opposite >> is true, >> there are only a few properties indicated to be animatable, > > I only looked in CSS animations for restrictions and saw none - I > erroneously > assumed that the same was true of transitions. Anyway, my point is > that I don't > see any need to restrict what SMIL can animate relative to *either* > of these CSS > proposals. I recently updated the CSS transitions specification to simply refer to SVG for the list of animatable properties. It was never the intention to produce a restricted set. Dean
Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 05:29:43 UTC