- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:06:30 +0200
- To: www-svg WG <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <DD1A8A4E-CFC3-4D53-803A-3E1AE3B1C97D@berjon.com>
Hi, I thought there might be interest in this here. Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-exi@w3.org > From: FABLET Youenn <Youenn.Fablet@crf.canon.fr> > Date: May 28, 2009 14:42:33 CEDT > To: "public-exi@w3.org" <public-exi@w3.org> > Cc: "fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp" <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp> > Subject: [public-exi] <none> > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/C1797CB6A125334AB23C5A0A160944AD2E639C7C33@cressida.crf.canon.fr > > > > Dear all, > > As some of you may remember, we had some discussions during TPAC > 2008 about how to use EXI for better SVG path compression. > During that discussion, I said that we made some experiments on > applying EXI compression on path data structured as XML trees. > The results were showing that, although the current compact syntax > does a really nice job, using EXI on XMLized path data would > certainly improve the situation, at least in the scenarios we are > aware of. > Please find some more details related to that topic in the attached > pdf file. > > Regards, > youenn >
-- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: SVG_Experiments.pdf
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 15:07:11 UTC